You are here
New Zealand slams Kyoto extension
DOHA, Qatar—New Zealand’s climate minister yesterday strongly defended a decision not to sign an extension of the Kyoto treaty that limits greenhouse gas emissions, saying the pact is outdated, and his country’s policy is “ahead of the curve.” At climate negotiations entering their final week in Doha, environmentalists have criticised New Zealand for announcing it wouldn’t join a planned extension of the 1997 Kyoto agreement.
“This excessive focus on Kyoto, Kyoto, Kyoto, Kyoto, was fine in the 1990s,” climate change minister Tim Groser told The Associated Press in an interview. “But given that it covers only 15 per cent of emissions, I’m sorry, this is not the main game.” Groser said the focus instead should be on creating a new pact that includes the developing countries—echoing a long-held position by the US, which never joined Kyoto.
Most of the world’s current emissions come from developing countries, and China is now the world’s top emitter. The Kyoto extension, which is supposed to be adopted in Doha, will likely only cover European countries and Australia, which together represent less than 15 percent of the world’s emissions.
“I think it’s time for green groups around the world to start to analyse this problem on the basis not of the rhetoric of the ‘90s, but some numerical analysis of where the problem lies today. Because it’s very different,” Groser said. “I just think we’re ahead of the curve.” Instead of binding targets, New Zealand has offered a voluntary pledge of cutting emissions by between ten per cent and 20 per cent by 2020, compared to 1990 levels.
The Kyoto extension is designed as a stopgap measure until a wider treaty is in place, scheduled for 2020. Developing countries have urged rich countries to make more ambitious emissions cuts until then. Groser said New Zealand wouldn’t firm up its pledge until after the Doha talks. The country wants to know if it can continue using Kyoto’s trading mechanism for emissions credits, which some countries say should only be available to those that set emissions targets.
“I have advised my Cabinet, literally I’ve said to them, ‘assume minimum rationally will prevail,’” Groser said. “Then I will come back after this meeting here and make a recommendation as to what unilateral figure we can do.” Climate activists accused Groser of eroding his country’s green image.
“New Zealand is in fact behind the play, as they have chosen not to finalise their emissions reductions targets until well after these talks, unlike most other developed countries,” said Simon Tapp from the New Zealand Youth Delegation.
A recent UN report showed greenhouse emissions, primarily from the burning of fossil fuels, have risen 20 per cent since 2000. Most climate scientists say such emissions are fueling a warming trend, which could lead to devastating shifts in climate, such as flooding of coastal regions and island nations.
User comments posted on this website are the sole views and opinions of the comment writer and are not representative of Guardian Media Limited or its staff.
Guardian Media Limited accepts no liability and will not be held accountable for user comments.
Guardian Media Limited reserves the right to remove, to edit or to censor any comments.
Any content which is considered unsuitable, unlawful or offensive, includes personal details, advertises or promotes products, services or websites or repeats previous comments will be removed.
User profiles registered through fake social media accounts may be deleted without notice.